Today we read the short story "Lamb to the Slaughter", (written by Roald Dahl) and after that we watched the Alfred Hitchcock version. I preferred the original short story a lot more than the screen version. This is because I liked the way the short story was written, with little dialog and a lot of good descriptions. Here is an example that I liked:
"She loved to luxuriate in the presence of this man, and to feel-almost as a sunbather feels the sun- that warm male glow that came out of him to her when they were alone together".
"She loved to luxuriate in the presence of this man, and to feel-almost as a sunbather feels the sun- that warm male glow that came out of him to her when they were alone together".
The policemen ate the evidence |
I did not expect the story to end the way it did, so I was rather surprised. However, this surprising ending made the short story interesting and fun. While reading it, I didn't understand why she put the meat in the oven, but it turned out to be a great way to remove the evidence.
Short but interesting post where you compare the short story and the screen play. I have to agree with you, the short story is so much better. I think you found a great paragraph to show that she did love her husband. That is not so apparent in the Hitchcock version.
ReplyDeleteHello Sara, I really enjoyed your blog about the screen play and the story. Although I have not read or seen it, it sounds very nice and very interesting and I would like to. I very much enjoyed how you put in your personal opinions and thoughts about it and also that you included a short excerpt from it. I would love to read another blog of your you are very talented. I was curious if you were to change part of the story what part would you change? Well thank you for the wonderful blog. Sincerely Cassidy
ReplyDelete